You are here

Continuity or Rupture (part one)

Continuity or Rupture (part one)



7 min

| 2007 |

hits: 1042

An infamous hypothesis on the difference between the young and the old Marx was formulated by Louis Althusser. He assumes an "epistomological rupture" in Marx's works, i.e. he (schematically) divides Marx's works into a hegelian-philosophical early work and a late essentially scientific work that came to completion in the volumes of "Capital". For Althusser, the rupture took place with the "German Ideology", written in 1845. In their preface the editors argue firmly against such dissection of Marx's works. Karl Reitter explains why Althusser's hypothesis must be seen as inappropriate by describing the aspects of continuity in Marx's works that clearly connect the early and the late work.

team: echna / flo


This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent spam.

Embed Video

You can adjust the size of the video by changing WIDTH and HEIGHT.
for instance 16 x 9 video: WIDTH: 425 HEIGHT: 245